Talk:Etienne Saqr

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Extremly POV

edit

This article was even worse than the Guardians one!! I wonder who wrote it. Its full of propaganda on Sakr. Just look at the "sources," and you get an idea of what im talking about. Can someone please check the facts of the article also, maybe a person or contributors from the Lebanese Civil War article, cause some facts here are very shaky. Im sure some people from the Guardians themselves wrote this on wiki, again wiki is not a propaganda machine, it is an encyclopedia so leave all your opinions to yourselves. --Doge120 05:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

POV and references

edit

In light of the AfD, I have removed some of the more polemical assertions and added citations for some more factual ones. I invite anyone interested in the subject to find a more varied set of references on which to build the article. Pascal.Tesson 20:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Etienne Saqr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply