This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Ethics of eating meat received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Some mention on the ethical stance of In Vitro/lab cultured meat as it becomes commercially available
Possible arguments against (sources needed)
Development of antibiotic resistant bacteria in animals given antibiotics to promote growth
Removes risk of transmission of disease to humans from animals (viruses etc).
Greatly lessened risk of food poisoning from meat and animal products
(I checked this and most sources say food poisoning mostly comes from uncooked meat and animal products) Calibas 00:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, what I mean is we need is a source that points this out as an advantage of a vegetarian/vegan diet. Richard001 03:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
But it's NOT an advantage, you're just straw-grasping for anything that makes your argument look validated. You may as well argue that, since potatoes can be poisonous if left to sit too long, it's advantageous to only eat meat.
Priority 4
This article was nominated for deletion on April 6, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep and stubbify.
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion
What does that mean? Is it a typo? I can't make any sense of it... WilbaAtWikipedia (talk) 09:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Makes no sense at all. The quote is taken from an obscure paper by Justin Leiber in 1988 [1]. I doubt the user that originally added this paper read the paper, they may have copied it from Daniel Dennett who probably got the quote wrong [2]. If you search online for this quote, the only hits you get are from Daniel Dennett who has put the quote in many of his publications. It is a cherry-picked quote missing various bits of text. I would be interested in knowing what Leiber really said. Unfortunately I don't have access to his 1988 paper. It's might be worth asking someone that has access to it so we can fact check the source. Psychologist Guy (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
