Talk:Essex County, Massachusetts

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Prairieplant in topic Map request

Untitled

edit

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Map request

edit

It would be nice if there were an interior map showing the municipalities and other entities of interest which are internal or adjacent to to the county. -- Beland 02:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Link added to a Massachusetts government map of cities and towns. See external links. Yellowdesk 00:16, 8 October 2006 (UTC)!Reply
The map showing the county within the state shows the county shape in red, but has no outline of the state of Massachusetts. Perhaps the state outline could be added. I am viewing this article on a mobile phone. - - Prairieplant (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not totally accurate

edit

It's not totally accurate to say that Essex County "continues to exist as a historic geographic area." It also plays the role of a state judicial (court) district. Bostoner (talk) 03:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The historical intro is too brief to be any good. Counties originated in the judicial system. Our main ref, the 4-volume work, Arrington, is a good one, but apparently no one cared to do a decent write-up from it. I plan to see what I can do. I anticipate writing enough to fill out the blank space there, so it can stay for the moment.Branigan 00:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Removed non-encyclopedic addition to the demographics

edit

"In 2006, Essex County received the dubious honor of being named number one on Forbes Magazine's list of most overpriced places to live in the U.S. The magazine cited high living costs and expensive real estate as the major reasons Essex County was picked over cities with higher mean real estate values (San Diego, New York, Honolulu.)"

Sounds a bit bitter. I don't blame the editor for being bitter, but I insist it must be kept out of WP. If life is a sea of sorrow, the intellect must find a way to ride over it like a cork. This reply as well as the paragraph is actually non-encyclopedic. WP knows no dubious honors, nor any overpricing. This is the pure land, here. Real estate is not expensive. Moreover, we aren't interested in the momentary economic fluctuations that happen to Essex county. And finally, do you think you are telling us something we don't know? What, you want sympathy? So don't we all. We don't need a Wikipedia economist to tell us prices are high. And finally, there is no ref except "Forbes Magazine." Mr. Forbes wants to get richer by telling us how poor we are. Life is nothing without paradoxes.Branigan 00:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Cities, towns, etc

edit

An attempt was made to list subordinate places, such as "villages." I first noticed that quite a few major subordinate places were missing. I thought I would find a full list and put that in. Here is what I discovered. Definitions by the Census Bureau and the state are in a state of flux. There is no stable list of definitions. Unfortunately these changing circumstances mean that there is no permanent truth for WP to report. So, articles on the topic have become for the most part obsolete, but because they are, they have been abandoned by the editors. Second, the list of possible subordinate places is very large. The northern Essex district site maintains an index of local names many pages in length. On what basis shall we select names for WP? Not only that, but just since I started working on this article, some of these sites have gone dead, presumably for updating. My judgement for this article is that the local places are best left off the list of cities and towns. That list is fairly stable. The only change not encompassed by WP is that of Amesbury from town to city. For a while the web sites and WP led us to believe Amesbury though a city preferred to be called a town. That hogwash could only have been a temporary figment. it is calling itself a city now. So, I am simplifying this list to the cities and towns, which are actually incorporated.Branigan 10:25, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Essex County, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Essex County, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Essex County, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply