Talk:Esquina Común
![]() | Esquina Común is currently an Agriculture, food and drink good article nominee. Nominated by (CC) Tbhotch™ at 04:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Restaurant in Mexico City, Mexico |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Esquina Común/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 04:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 01:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Round 2! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 01:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | According to the Earwig report, the top result (as of this GA review) is at a 14.5% similarity. It is unlikely that the article contains any copyright violations. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article is stable; no edit wars have occurred. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Both images are freely licensed. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Logo and physical location photos are relevant. Caption of the building photo helps determine where it is located. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Quickfail?
edit- Spotted no cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
- Article is stable.
- Earwig shows no copyvios.
- First GA review, so no previous mistakes to note.
- No obvious issues found in article.