Talk:Esprit de Corps (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Notability edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A 2007 article with multiple issues including "close connection" (2017; WP:COI - policy), "neutrality" (2017; WP:NPOV -policy and Five pillars), "does not cite any sources" (2016; verifiability - policy), and of course, using the "External links" (2014) as a source, all against policies and guidelines. Some have not been marked. The article uses the names of several living people (I marked the talk page) and even stated, "In 1991, Esprit de Corps ran a controversial article", and it named names. This very likely should not be on Wikipedia without a source, but there are several more instances, not just one. There are also weasel words such as "proud history".

An article, with no sources, breaking "all the rules" (or most), and still around 16 years later. -- Otr500 (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic