Talk:Ernest Oppenheimer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I might be interested to add some material to this article at some point in the future, but have never edited an actual article before. Is there any Gemology and Jewelry editor ....or anyone....who might be able to assist, particular in guiding me to a source that would help me understand how to set up the formatting? One possibility would be that I could post the material to the discussion page for a time and solicit feedback. Then, if the feedback is supportive, I could try to add it to the article. --FurnaldHall (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Be bold. Socrates2008 (Talk) 12:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ernest Oppenheimer/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
WHY DO YOU NOT STATE ALSO THAT THEY WERE TEN SIBLINGS AND APOOR FAMILY IN GERMANY. HE STARTED AS A TEA-BOY IN HIS UNCLES DUNKELSBUHLER COMPANY IN LONDON AND AFTER THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS IN SOUTH AFRICA, HIS UNCLE SENT HIS BROTHER OVER FIRST AND THEN HIM TO GO AND GET OF THE DIAMONDS.

THEIR DE BEERS AND AAC'S IN SOUTH AFRICA OPERATED IN THE NORMAL BRITISH APARTHEID FASHION WHERE NON-WHITE PEOPLES WERE RELEGATED TO THE MINING JOBS AND NOT ANY DECENT POSITIONS FOR DECADES AND NEVER GIVEN SUPERVISORY OR MANAGERIAL POSITIONS. IN FACT THEY EVEN DISMISSED A SINGLE-PARENT, DRAUGHTSWOMAN CONTRACTOR FROM AAC, SAYING THE PROVERBIAL "WE HAVE NO MORE WORK FOR YOU", IN 1993 AFTTER SHE HER ARTICLE IN THE SUNDAY TIMES ON 12 MARCH 1993 AND MAY 1993, REGARDING HER FIGHTING FOR HER ONE GRANDMOTHER'S OVER 300 PROPERTIES, WHICH THE BRITISH APARTHEID LAWS MADE THE GOVERNMENT DISPOSSESS HER OF IN 1958 - 1962.

IT IS A BATANT LIE BY THE OPPENHEIMERS TO NOW SAY THAT ERNEST DISAPPROVED OF THE LAWS - THEY HAD ALL THE MONEY AND POWER SO WHY DID THEY NOT CHANGE THEIR WORK POLICIES AND PRACTICES TO PROVE THAT THEY DISAGREED WITH THE LAWS? I KNOW OF MANY SMALL COMPANIES WHO DID SO, BUR DEFINITELY NOT THE DE BEERS AND ANGLO'S, THAT IS FOR SURE AS I HAD PERSONALLY WORKED AT OVER 30 COMPANIES, ESPECIALLY THE ENGINEERING FIELD, BUT NOT ONLY AND ON ALMOST ALL OF THE MINING PROJECTS TOO. HENCE, I KNOW PRECISELY WHAT HAD HAPPENED IN SOUTH AFRICAN WORK-PLACE, UNLIKE THE ANC, WHO DID NOT WORK, BUT WERE IN EXILE OR IN PRISON. SO THE ANC SHOULD NOT BE SPEAKING ON OUR BEHALF, BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN BOUGHT OVER BY THE OPPENHEIMERS. THE ARE SELL-OUTS AND NOW ALSO SUDDENLY ENRICHED, WHILE WE HAVE NOTHING, YET OUR FORBEARERS WERE WEALTHY AND HARD-WORKING.

THANKS, WIKEPEDIA, FOR ALL OF YOUR HELP.

Last edited at 17:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ernest Oppenheimer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply