This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The recent discovery of this specimen means it does not have an extensive literature because most vertebrate palaeontologists have not had the chance to examine it. The one paper quoted is readable in full, and seems to cover the whole content of our page. What more is an editor supposed to do? It's high time we thought a bit before we put flags up. You just can't get a more appropriate reference than the one given in the article. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
