Talk:Erinsborough

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic Requested move 25 January 2022

Untitled

edit

PirateNet has closed. Why doesn't the article say so? 175.37.171.197 (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Geoffrey HilliardReply

My edits were perfectly correct. Nick has joined the hospital staff. Amber and Imogen are now university not high school students. They were valid updates. 58.110.96.69 (talk) 10:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Geoffrey HilliardReply

They may have been correct, but they were unsourced. You need to provide reliable sources to verify your additions. I found this source for Nick for you - [1]. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Erinsborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Erinsborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

The 82

edit

It's come to my thought that The 82 should not have its own section and be reduced to the "Other locations" section of the page. My reasoning is that there is barely any information included in the probe and that no storylines have been included, unlike The Waterhole for example. As seen, this questions whether it really needs its own section. Please note that this is not me trying to "change everything I see", just a suggestion. Please let me know your thoughts. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 02:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 January 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


ErinsboroughLocations of Neighbours – Upon realising the amount of discussion of locations beyond Erinsborough here, and in conjunction with the stated desire of the series to utilise more locations beyond the suburb going forward, I think it's appropriate to move the page and ensure there's a framework for locations in and beyond Erinsborough to be mentioned as they arise. This would also help to address the tagged in-universe issue. U-Mos (talk) 21:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. دَستخَط، اِفلاق (کَتھ باتھ) 05:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. I personally disagree. The article is about the suburban location and it is fair to include surrounding suburbs and locations that appear(ed) on a regular/frequent basis. I do not think it would make sense to rename the entire article when there could just be one extra section that names other locations/suburbs. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support The proposed title is a more accurate description of what's in this article, which is a series of descriptions of the different locations on the show. Our article isn't about the fictional town, its notability, its in universe history, real world discussion of it, etc -- it is just individual descriptions of the various locations on the show. We do certainly have encyclopedic pages on specific fictional locations that provide more genuine info about the subject, like Middle Earth or Hogwarts, but in this case the proposed title fits what this article covers.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose because Ramsay Street also exists as a separate article, I'd suggest splitting this article instead. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.