This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I hold that these edits (see [1], [2], [3], [4]) are synthetic and inappropriate. I will, of course, abide by the consensus. Please contribute to the discussion. Quis separabit? 01:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I don't find the inclusion of David Koch's candidacy during O'Keefe's tenure meaningful unless there's context added to it that tells the reader who Koch is, why that matters for our understanding of O'Keefe, etc. You have to explain to the reader why you're telling them who the vice-presidential candidate was and not the presidential candidate, and what impact that has or had on O'Keefe. If you think the article quality would be aided by bringing in Koch, then do the work to source an assertion such as "Koch has since become a prominent and controversial political figure, supporting yada yada. O'Keefe would later work for or with organizations supported by Koch, such as..." and show your references. Jmozena (talk) 17:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
