Talk:Eric Garris

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 2600:1004:B1A3:85B9:D5B3:90AC:42F:70E9 in topic "Non-partisan"?

Foremost pioneer edit

  • It would not be an exaggeration to count Eric Garris among the foremost pioneers to tap into the power of the internet, and he may well go down in history as the first to truly harvest its revolutionary political potential. Early on he led the way in tapping into the power of the internet that was absolutely vital for the present old right revival, first with helping found the online magazine LewRockwell.com.

While I have no reason to doubt that Garris helped with LRC, the rest of this statement makes bold assertions that we'd need to attribute to a notable source. -Willmcw 16:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

This entry is promotional fluff in most respects. It also refers to lewrockwell.com as a “prominent” web site, but today its ranking among all US web sites is 10,954th. Antiwar.com is ranked 34,343rd (Alexa). Nicmart (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Briggs lawsuit edit

The article mentions that Garris was one who sued Briggs for absenting himself from a debate. The lawsuit had some sort of resolution or withdrawn. Unless that information is included, the statement should be removed. Nicmart (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Non-partisan"? edit

It seems like a major stretch of the word "non-partisan" to use it to describe AntiWar.com here, given the very clear conservative bent of its founders. Being willing to criticize both parties is not "non-partisan," as one can - and these folks apparently do - criticize the Republican party from the right; the section about libertarian dissatisfaction, for instance, does not mention that they considered an entryist strategy towards the Democratic party. 2600:1004:B1A3:85B9:D5B3:90AC:42F:70E9 (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply