Talk:Eric Gallager

Latest comment: 7 days ago by Axad12 in topic Some sources that may be of help

Some sources that may be of help

edit
  • Specific text to be added or removed: He is known for introducing legislation regarding Free software.[1][2][3][4] He also was recognized as the state legislator who had tweeted the most in mid-2023.[5] One of his bills to receive media coverage was a bill to establish the official IPA pronunciation of "Concord" (/ˈkɒŋkərd/) and "New Hampshire" (/nuːˈhæmpʃər/).[6]
  • Reason for the change: Article is a stub
  • References supporting change:
  1. ^ Brooks, David (Jan 12, 2022). "Lots of recycled arguments when the legislature ponders open source software". Granite Geek. The Concord Monitor. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  2. ^ Farough, Greg (Feb 15, 2023). "New Hampshire residents: Voice your support for software freedom on Thursday, February 16". fsf.org. The Free Software Foundation. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  3. ^ Farough, Greg (Feb 17, 2023). "New Hampshire residents: Support another software freedom initiative on Tuesday, February 21". fsf.org. The Free Software Foundation. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  4. ^ Various. "Lightning Talks". libreplanet.org. The Free Software Foundation. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  5. ^ Quorum Analytics (August 2023). "While the Federal Government Slows Its Legislative Action, States Keep Pace with Over 100,000 Bills Introduced in 2023" (PDF). Quorum. Quorum Analytics, Inc. Retrieved 18 October 2023.
  6. ^ Brooks, David (29 October 2023). "How do you say "Concord"? A proposed law would make it official". concordmonitor.com. The Concord Monitor. Retrieved 8 November 2023.

Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 12:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note done: It doesn't seem clear from the sources that the subject 'is known for' what is being claimed, as opposed to that he simply did it. Also, having 'tweeted the most' in mid-2023 is a piece of non-encyclopaedic trivia. The other item proposed for inclusion claims 'media coverage' when the issue seems simply to have been reported. So, to conclude, the material is all either promotional or trivial and thus isn't worthy of inclusion. The article is a stub, but the bar is still the same for material to be included. Axad12 (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply