Talk:Ergonym

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 September 2019 by reviewer Missvain (talk · contribs).

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move and CE edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Today I did an uncontroversial RM per WP:SINGULAR and did much CE before that.

Having had a little more time, I suggest that this is a neologism in English Wikipedia. Wiktionary does not have a WP:DICDEF for it, and I can find it in none of my woodware dictionaries. None of the sources is from a primarily English-speaking author or journal (and I have checked them all). This is not WP:OR, but a lot bounds on being a dictionary definition and lists of examples rather than an encyclopaedic article. Some of the article appears to be written from a Russian POV, yet there is no Russian article I can find. Most of it is just a specious set of "words that come from somewhere or another". German WP does not have an article on it, neither does Finnish (of course Finnish is Finno-Ugric so has little relation to a Slavic or Germanic language, but that is by the by).

The sources given do not back up the content of this article, which appears to be written by a Russian, I mean just from internal evidence, yet there is no article about it in Russian WP.

This may be – I am guessing – because the original contributor User:Lucy Pogosyan was not familiar with English Wikipedia and can probably help me get this article into shape here, that she could provide the content while I do the markup and so forth. I'd very much like her to help work with me to improve this article, but in its current state, frankly it should never have got past draft. How something gets from Draft to being approved without checking for WP:SINGULAR is a failure of draft review, not of the contributing editor. 178.164.132.118 (talk) 12:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic