Talk:Equality impact assessment

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I have removed the following passage: TRL has produced some of the highest quality and detailed EqIAs in the UK including......

It breaches our policy on neutrality (who says that they're the best EqIAs?) and, more specifically, weasel words and peacock words. Please do not reinsert the paragraph without discussing here. ╟─TreasuryTagconsulate─╢ 09:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

They are good examples of high quality EqIA and I think you'll be hard pressed to find better examples that use actual data and robust analysis. I have removed the comment about TRL but reinserted the examples and added another. I really think these examples will help people understand what an EqIA is and the kind of standard they should be aiming for. User:WalkUK
"I think you'll be hard pressed to find better examples," – I repeat, you are not qualified to make that call. Read the three policies I linked to: you need to cite an unambiguous and reliable source if you are going to champion anything as being of high quality. As the article currently is, things are fine. ╟─TreasuryTagstannator─╢ 10:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Older people edit

Older than whom? Paul Magnussen (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equality impact assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Equality impact assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply