 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Unsourced
editThe article is full of unsourced statements, which must be treated as highly doubtful without sources, especially lists of accepted species and synonyms. Just one example I noticed: "Epipactis lusitanica (S. and N. Portugal)- now synonym of Epipactis tremolsii subsp. lusitanica" – says who? The World Checklist of Selected Plant Families accepts E. lusitanica. Orchid taxonomy is very varied between sources, and without sources is of little use. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)