Talk:Epidaurus

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Phso2 in topic digraph /αυ/

Amplification edit

Is it really necessary to emphasize that the design of the theater allows for perfect acoustics without amplification? Could not one infer that a theater built in 400 BC would be devoid of amplification? Aureliusweb (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

i think the idea is that it is emphasizing the fact that the Greeks were able to make a theater with perfect acoustics, even outside. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.76.59 (talk) 00:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Asclepius edit

You should link this lemma http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asclepius — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.255.37.136 (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epidaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

digraph /αυ/ edit

The Wikipedia entry for Ναυπλιον (Ναυπλιο) is .../Nafplio. I agree with that, because the /αυ/ digraph is pronounced "av" or "af" (devoiced). So Nafplio is a good representation of the sound of the Greek name.

If you follow the same logic for Επίδαυρος (which contains the same /αυ/ digraph), you come up with Epidavros (or Epidafros I think) and I would expect the Wikipedia entry to be .../Epidavros But instead, the entry is called "Epidaurus", presumably pronounced "EPI-DOOR-US". But that is not the way Επίδαυρος is pronounced.

Has the name "Epidaurus" been properly transcribed (phonetically) from the original Greek to modern English? 205.233.56.35 (talk) 07:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, the name is the common English name, not a transcription (like Athens and not Athína, Patras and not Patra, Corinth and not Kórinthos etc etc)--Phso2 (talk) 18:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply