![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image
editWhat in the world is this image? What is it based on? If there's a scientific image it was based on, why don't we have that instead? Looks pretty unencyclopedic -- and almost certainly based on OR. --— Rhododendrites talk | 16:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Scientific images are rarely released under the correct license for re-use on Wikipedia. This appears to be the only illustration available under creative commons. At least it's technically accurate, if not the highest quality. MMartyniuk (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just because there's no other image doesn't mean any image is appropriate. I may be mistaken as to my knowledge of image policies, but this sure looks to violate NPOV and V. What reliable source says that's Eosinopteryx? What reliable source says it's accurate? --— Rhododendrites talk | 22:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's obviously based on the skeletons figured in the paper and the accompanying illustration [1]. If we required all images on wiki to come from published sources rather than self-created images, we'd have no images. The image also passed our Wikiproject:Dinosaurs/image review You're welcome to bring it up there if you feel it's artistic quality is high enough, but its accuracy is easy to check. MMartyniuk (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just because there's no other image doesn't mean any image is appropriate. I may be mistaken as to my knowledge of image policies, but this sure looks to violate NPOV and V. What reliable source says that's Eosinopteryx? What reliable source says it's accurate? --— Rhododendrites talk | 22:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Eosinopteryx page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Eosinopteryx" page.