Talk:Environmental control system

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


I don't have time now, but this article is missing references to Wing Anti Ice commonly being part of the ECS and also the various other classes of ECS for smaller business jets, and other transportation platforms. Maybe when I have time I will come back. ;)

Air quality front to aft? edit

I was just wondering about this:

- Boeing and Airbus jetliners supply constant flow per unit length of the cabin.

- Airflow into the fuselage is approximately constant, and pressure is maintained by varying the opening of the "Out Flow Valve" (OFV). Most modern jetliners have a single OFV located near the bottom aft end of the fuselage

If both are true, air inserted in the front of the cabin would have to make its way to the back, resulting in a net front-to-aft airflow... and air would have passed by more passangers towards the aft of the cabin.

Is this true, or is air vented over the entire length of the cabin and then transported to the back of the fuselage using conduits?

-

On a sidenote, i always believed this net flow used to be the reason that smoking seats where always on the back rows (and first class is up front). Any insights?


Comments:

In principle, these comments are correct. Air is vented over the entire length of the aircraft (think of all the gaspers above the seats in the lugage bins).

Please note however that the gaspers (where the air flows from the ventilation ducts into the cabin) are located near the ceiling. The slots, where the air exists the passenger area and goes into the cargo bays, are located near the floor (in the DADO panles). So the air flows front-to-aft AND downwards. This results in most smelly air flowing downwards before it reaches the passengers in the back.

To avoid any nicotine fumes reaching the forward compartment, the smoking area is loacted in the back.

First Class is located in the front to assure that first class passengers can board the area last (in most cases only the front door is used for boarding) and they receive their meals and service first (near to the galley and crew area). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.211.57.138 (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lower cabin altitudes versus fatigue life edit

"The new airliners such as the Airbus A380 and Boeing 787 will have lower maximum cabin altitudes which help in fatigue reduction during flights."

I think this argument is incorrect. Lower maximum cabin altitude means higher minimum cabin pressure. This higher minimum cabin pressure results is a higher pressure difference between cabin and outside.

With new composites used in the A380 and B787, the structure can handle these bigger loads, since less rivets are used and more glued connections (les stress peaks).

I think the argument should read:

The new airliners such as the Airbus A380 and Boeing 787 will have lower maximum cabin altitudes because of their composite structures and theirfore their lower fatigue damage growth.

What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.92.195.174 (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Perhaps the initial quote should have read: "The new airliners such as the Airbus A380 and Boeing 787 will have lower maximum cabin altitudes which help in PASSENGER fatigue reduction during flights." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.188.83 (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fixed it to read "Passenger fatigue" for clarity, as I'm pretty sure this is what's meant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.244.72.5 (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Missing information: spacecraft edit

Manned spacecraft have environmental control systems (with the same name), too. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No response in over 3 years? A spacecraft ECS has exactly the same purpose (air supply, thermal control and cabin pressurization) as the one on aircraft. The only difference is, the air supply is not taken from the engines, as these are not "air-breathing". Without objection, I'm going to expand it by adding a section, and moving the article to Environmental control system. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

More Electric? edit

This article only focuses on pneumatic systems - it would be useful if someone would provide an overview of how "more electric" systems (such as that installed on the 787) differ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.244.72.5 (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nothing about other military vehicles with ECSs edit

I came here from a link in Russia's current main battle tank article about its latest ECS for it. This article should be expanded to included details about such solutions in other craft, namely ground war vehicles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.115.164.123 (talk) 07:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Environmental control system (aircraft). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Environmental control system (aircraft). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply