Talk:Entoloma bloxamii
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Victuallers in topic Article development
 | This article uses text donated by Wildscreen from their ARKive project (see below). For further information, please see Wikipedia:GLAM/ARKive. |
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Wildscreen ARKive texts. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011090810014488. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
 | A fact from Entoloma bloxamii appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article development
editOkay, yes I think the ARKive expansion is a big step in the right direction from a stub I created earlier today. Now for good referencing and buffing, what I'd do now is have a look at the description there, and the reference page. So it's awaiting an expert to double check, but never mind, we'll use the material as a stepping stone. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
This reference is accessible. Good for locales. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Web of Science yields none on name search :( Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well done - Andy and Casliber - see it at DYK soon Victuallers (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2011 (UTC)