Talk:Enthusia Professional Racing

Sourcing

@Rickyony, WP requires that text be attributed to reliable sources (WP:V). Please add sources so readers can verify the text's claims, and if you can't, please revert your edit. czar 08:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

(diff) @Rickyony, when you disagree with an editor, it's common practice to discuss the edit on the talk page rather than reverting back and forth. Verifiability is a core tenet of Wikipedia—we don't keep text with unsourced claims. So the uncited text in this article needs to be sourced or removed. "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material." czar 04:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Typically, to judge what should be included we use reliable secondary sources and report the material neutrally. Article size is no reason to keep unsourced or overly detailed content. I wouldn't remove all of it, but it definitely contains a lot of inappropriate stuff. "very detailed graphics", "ultra realistic engine", "appears to be", "flaws and perfectible aspects", "compared to 700+", "most seen in other games" -- none of this is verified content. It reads like an advertisement. WP:BURDEN is with the editor restoring such content, not the editor removing. Every non-obvious fact has to be backed up by a reliable source(s). It may be easier to just rewrite it all ground-up rather than trying to salvage. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)