Talk:Entasis

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 24.63.178.66 in topic untitled

untitled edit

  • This article is mentioned in the media here but I don't know the template for that. Please remove my waffle if you do know it. Malick78 (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

A stub its no more but could to be better.--Mario todte 20:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's cleaned up.--Mario todte 20:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I suspect the paragraph on "ekstasis" to be a hoax -- I can't find reference to this anywhere else. But I'm not changing it, as I don't know enough about the subject. eggsyntax (talk) 02:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I'm removing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.178.66 (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Entasis in relation to order edit

I am of the impression that Entasis was typically different for different orders. For example. the narrowing of the column started at a different point (1/3 up, etc.) from the base. Also, the degree of narrowing was lesser in later antiquity. If correct, this isn't really covered in the article and should be.

Also, the pronunciation of the word is not shown and I think that would be useful too.