Talk:Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I recommend expanding "Festus" to "Rufius Festus", to avoid confusion with the much earlier Sextus Pompeius Festus. I do not wish to make this edit myself, as I have no knowledge of whether in fact Rufius Festus made use of Enmann's hypothesized Ur-dokument.

66.186.180.196 (talk) 22:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Further recommended emendation. edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Furthermore: by Epitome de Caesaribus I suppose that the work attributed to Aurelius Victor is meant; I would omit the words "Epitome de Caesaribus"-- unless the author doubts that the work is by Victor?

Mjhrynick (talk) 23:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Epitome and Aurelius Victor`s Caesares are two different works; the author of the Epitome was an "Anonymus" in the late 4th century (cf. J. Schlumberger, Die Epitome de Caesaribus. München 1974), who also used the EKG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.176.223.176 (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic