Talk:Enlightened moderation

Latest comment: 10 years ago by BrownHairedGirl in topic Requested move

The original "Enlightened Moderation" article was published in the Washington Post on June 1, 2004 (not June 2, cited presently under Link): http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5081-2004May31.html

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message edit

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I say expand. There's plenty of expansion potential here. I have plans to expand this article, actually, after some information-gathering. MeenSuup 18:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not quite where I'd like it to be, but at least it's more than a definition now. Still working on it... MeenSuup 15:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Intro removed edit

The definitions were for the term rationality, see eg [1] Yceren Loq (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC).Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply



Enlightened ModerationEnlightened moderation – Unless it's the title of a book or something like that, it should avoid unnecessary capitalization. Greg Bard (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Greg Bard (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Support – no evidence of it being a proper name for anything. Dicklyon (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.