Talk:English Electric Canberra/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Article length and possible spin-offs

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Wikipedians, given the long history of this aircraft, numbers built and number of operators, this article has grown to a considerable length. As with similarly notable aircraft, it may be appropriate to consider moving some of its sections with long lists to their own articles. I propose to create list-articles for "Operators" and "Preserved aircraft", leaving just a brief section with the link in this "parent" article. Hope there is no concerns with this approach. Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:English Electric Canberra/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Looks pretty good to me; it'd have to go through peer review to get to higher status, anyway. Karl Dickman ^talk 05:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 05:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on English Electric Canberra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Wing sweep angles

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, the article says "Outboard of the engine nacelles, the wing has a leading edge sweep of 4° and trailing edge sweep of −14°." Those numbers have been there since an edit in 2006 (and currently, of course, mirrored on numerous web pages). However, to my eye the sweep angles look more like 13° and -20°. Can't find any source except the ortographic projection picture though. I tend to believe my own eyes, not a sourceless edit from 2006. A bold fix coming up. --Micraboy (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

I've reverted your bold edits, but added a citation needed tag. User:Emt147 was a good aviation user, so I trust he had a reliable source he didn't cite. Photos aren't reliable sources of themselves, and measuring the angle on an orthographic projection is original research. Either way, we do need cite a reliable source. - BilCat (talk) 07:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

I measured the angles on a fairly large scale accurate drawing and make them +14 and -20. It looks very much like the original editor left the number '1' out by mistake and/or possibly mixed the figures up. Hopefully someone with a Canberra monograph can correct it and provide the cite. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

In the article text we could anyway have angles that are closer to the truth. Now we are pretty wide off. Almost any photograph tells the eye that the sweep angles are more acute than 4 and -14 (of course looking with a bare eye is original research...). The trailing edge wikilink could also be reinserted there, I guess. I leave it to other editors, and go on fixing typos on random articles :-) --Micraboy (talk) 10:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on English Electric Canberra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on English Electric Canberra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)