Talk:Engineering design process/Archives/2014
Latest comment: 9 years ago by NebY in topic Conceptualization
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Conceptualization
The conceptualization section is full of vague management-speak words. Are things like word association really an important part of the engineering design process? I would like to clean this up, but am having trouble finding good unbiased sources that are common to all engineering (not just software, for example). Some have 3 steps, 6 steps, or 10 steps, and so don't match up well with this. Nerfer (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. The article's title is one that might appear as a module on an engineering course, but the content of that course would vary greatly between lecturers, institutions and curricula. I am not convinced it's a suitable subject for an article at all. Repeated attempts[1][2][3] to link to this article from the lede of Engineering perplex me; they appear promotional. NebY (talk) 09:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)