Talk:Energy in Taiwan
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2A02:908:4C1D:ECC0:FDB2:4577:12D6:B70F in topic The pro nuclear referendum should be reflected in the article
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Energy in Taiwan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Current information (2007) edit
See http://web2.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/About/energy%20situation/main/en_01.html --JensMueller (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
"Green energy technologies are a top priority..." edit
Green energy technologies are a top priority on the Taiwan government's list of new industries to promote. This sounds campaignish. Is there any objective evidence for this claim? Readin (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
The pro nuclear referendum should be reflected in the article edit
Since the latest referendum was against the policy of the government of phasing out the nuclear - should we not add this information to the article? The taiwan government already confirmed that it will follow the will of the people — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:4C1D:ECC0:FDB2:4577:12D6:B70F (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2018 (UTC)