Talk:Empire Earth (video game)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, I am re-reviewing this article to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that it doesn't meet criteria for the reasons outlined below and needs a bit of work, with the broad issues outlined below:

• Gameplay is almost entirely unreferenced.

• There's a lot of fannish language throughout, suggesting POV concerns. For example in gameplay: "The game itself contains many unique and innovative features, including a well implemented "morale" system"

• The prose is pretty poor in many places, for example lots of repetition: "After the Prehistoric Age, units such as naval units can be built."

• Strip out some of the excessive internal linking; having a sea of blue links decreases legibility and the impact of links.

• Likewise the campaign is unreferenced.

• There are excessive non-free images throughout, in violation of WP:NFCC. For example, what does File:Early EE.PNG add to the article, considering the early game elements are never discussed in any detail?

• There's very little discussion about the expansion, which is a detriment considering it's referenced several times before the article actually gets around to explaining what it is.

• Reception is short (as is development), but that's not as much of an issue for GA.

• The Death and rebirth section is another fan-written section with no reliable sources to suggest it is worth mentioning in the article.

Given the number of concerns above, I am boldly delisting the article. Remember that you can renominate the article at any time you feel it meets the criteria. I don't watchlist old reviews, so drop me a line on my talk if you have questions. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 14:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.