Talk:Emmanuel Frémiet

Link to "American Museum of Natural History

Elsewhere on the web, we find the following written by Constance Areson Clark:

"American Museum president Henry Fairfield Osborn, so often vilified by anti-evolutionists, took a prominent role in the defense of evolution in the press; yet he understood, and to some extent shared, the public distaste for simian ancestors, ape-men and cave men. He realized that much of the public saw them as defective, as caricatures or parodies of humans. He was also acutely aware of the long visual tradition associating monkeys and apes with unsavory characters and brutality, including ferocious or menacing looking apes and apes kidnapping human women for prurient purposes: Many people wrote to ask him whether rumors that apes kidnapped women were true. He received so many queries of this kind that he saw fit to deny them even in scientific papers, mentioning in particular the notorious 1854 sculpture by Emmanuel Fremiet, Gorilla Abducting a Negress. The museum had been given this sculpture as a gift, he revealed, but would never put it on exhibit, “because in the Museum exhibits we are trying to present only truth and to eliminate all misrepresentations of ape and human resemblance.”

So the "Stereotypeandsociety" link that claims this statue was on display should probably be removed until it can be verified.Mountshang 13:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

My smash-&-grab research suggests that Frémiet exhibited (or tried - it was rejected by the salon jury) his first version in 1859, not 1854 as Clark says, so right off the bat something is amiss. I'm curious about the "Negress" part too. looks Anglo in the version (1887) I'm looking at. Carptrash 16:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

A little more digging (references upon request) reveals that this early (1859) version is "known today only from photographs" - suggesting that no one has a copy secreted in their basement, certainly not before the 1887 version. Carptrash 16:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I just moved this here to talk about it

"and to equestrian statues in armour" from the sentence about what he chiefly devoted his time to. As far as I can tell his Joan of Arc statue is the only one fitting that description, and while there might have been one or two more, it was not a big thing for him. Carptrash (talk) 18:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Restoration of Philadelphia's Joan of Arc

The Philadelphia copy of Frémiet's Joan of Arc is undergoing restoration and regilding, and soon will be returned to Kelly Drive across from the Philadelphia Museum of Art. I plan to add more information about the restoration, since I just received a good source.--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Frémiet or Fremiet?

I believe the correct spelling omits the accent on the first 'e'. The French WP site has a note "La véritable orthographe est 'Fremiet'". The Musée D'Orsay site uses the unaccented version, as do the large majority of other sites on French Google. - Tim riley (talk) 09:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emmanuel Frémiet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130112212938/http://www.insecula.org/contact/A005795_oeuvre_1.html to http://www.insecula.org/contact/A005795_oeuvre_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Emmanuel Frémiet

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Emmanuel Frémiet's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "EB1911":

• From Auguste Raffet: One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Raffet, Denis Auguste Marie". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 22 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 813. Endnotes:
  • Raffet, by F. Lhomme (Paris, 1892).
  • Béraldi, Henri (1892). Raffet, peintre national. Paris: Librairie illustrée.
  • Dayot, Armand (1891). Raffet et son œuvre...100 compositions lithographiques: peintures à l'huile, aquarelles, sépias et dessins inédits. [Paris] Quantin: Librairies-imprimeries réunies.
  • Ladoué, Pierre (1946). Un peintre de l'épopée française: Raffet. Paris: A. Michel.
• From Lithography: Brooks, Frederick Vincent (1911). "Lithography" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 16 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 785–789.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)