Talk:Emma Stebbins

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 3 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NortheasternFoley. Peer reviewers: Rose Northeastern, Emsandell.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emma Stebbins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109172345/http://www.glbtq.com/arts/stebbins_e.html to http://www.glbtq.com/arts/stebbins_e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Going to be Making Edits

Hello!

I will be editing and adding more information on this article. For editing purposes, I have copied the content over to my sandbox page.

Best- NortheasternFoley (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review

NortheasternFoley -

I like your article- it's very well researched and planned out!

I made some very small grammatical changes, but otherwise, there are only two things I found.

1) I'm not positive of Wikipedia policy on citations, but it is confusing to me to have 3 citations after a paragraph. Is it appropriate to put the citation after the piece of information that you used the citation for? 2) The sentence where you talk about "due to Cushmans..." is a little confusing, maybe rephrase?

Otherwise it's good! Rose Northeastern (talk) 00:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)