Talk:Emily Ting
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JIAJIAHAOHAO. Peer reviewers: K223m, JackChadwick.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review JackChadwick (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Jack Chadwick
editthis article contains all the necessary information for constructing a strong article and well organized wikipedia page. it seems that you have gone into depth with your research and it has given you a good understanding of the overall contents of Emily Ting's life. while very factual, I believe the formatting need a bit of work, specifically the formatting within the heading of Career, there is lots of content there, but you should try to formate it more fluidly as it seems choppy when reading. another critique is the grammar and sentence phrasing, it is clear what you are trying to say but by fixing the grammar it will allow for a more coherent and well paced article. lastly i would add a bit more info int he open section of the article, maybe mention an award she won or something important about her family. other than those few things i believe your article is strong and well done, with small adjustments it would be a very effective article. JackChadwick (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Jack Chadwick
This article was very well done. I liked the amount of information you included, covering all aspects of Emily Ting’s career and life but still keeping the article concise and to the point. You had a good amount of sources that seemed reliable, although I would consider trying to find a few more reliable journal articles (which I understand can be difficult or impossible). Also it might be a good idea to put the filmography section of your article into a chart, it just makes it look more organized in my opinion. Overall this article was well written with the exception of a few punctuation errors which I attempted to fix while editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K223m (talk • contribs) 22:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)