Talk:Emilio Salgari

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Large cuts edit

I cut everything that was a copyright violation from either [1] or [2], which comprised roughly half the article. I attempted to summarize anything notable that was there, but didn't bother re-inserting mentions of his prominent fans unless there was a claim that Salgari was a significant influence on them. I cut nearly all of the "See also". They seemed to have nothing to do with Salgari other than being writers in the same genre at roughly the same time, and no claim was made of any association with them. I also removed Category:Italian science fiction writers as it was not said that he wrote science fiction -- in fact, it explicitly says he did not. A number of commercial links were removed as well.

Please ensure that any new content here is original work. TCC (talk) (contribs) 00:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good work! Even if there hadn’t been copyright issues it would have improved the article. But I am glad that the photo remains! —Ian Spackman 03:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
You, sir, are one of those from whom a good word is most valuable. Thank you. TCC (talk) (contribs) 20:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
What exactly were these supposed copyright violations? You guys seem to be missing Salgari's "Duemila Leghe sotto l'America" (Milan 1888)

FourtySixNtwo 00:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Salgari corsaribermuda.jpg edit

 

Image:Salgari corsaribermuda.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Salgari scorridori.jpg edit

 

Image:Salgari scorridori.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

A contradiction? edit

The article states that «At present only four titles have been translated into English.» but in the bibliography there are more than four titles in English. Why?--Dejudicibus (talk) 12:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Only six books "available in English", yet Bibliography lists ten more English titles... edit

Are these translations of the titles only, or WERE these books once available, or...? -- megA (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Science Fiction edit

The article, as well as the article science fiction, claim that Salgari is regarded as the father of italian science fiction. I find this to be quite a substantial claim, which definitely needs to be explained in much more detail somewhere in the article. At the moment the rest of the article has no mention of science fiction whatsoever, and with the notable exception of "Le meraviglie del Duemila" being marked as concerned with time travel, a reader interested in works of science fiction is left quite helpless between masses of pirates on one side and hordes of unspecified travelling adventurers on the other. --BjKa (talk) 22:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emilio Salgari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply