Talk:Emil Pagliarulo

Comment

I'm a wiki noob, can someone take care of this please? Seems like a bad redirect... 95.180.101.77 (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC) To be clear, "Adrenaline Vault" redirects to this page.

Good point. You can probably ask JimmyBlackwing as he is the one redirected to this page. I think Adrenaline Vault should redirect to the Pete Hines page, but that is my opinion.Timur9008 (talk) 19:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

One of the sources is a dead link

The third cited source (https://www.gamedeveloper.com/api/redirects?to=/view/feature/4003/exploring_a_devastated_world_emil_.php) is from a now defunct site, and there seems to be no archived version as far as I could find. 77.160.50.109 (talk) 13:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Mass removal of content

@MadJack72, would you care to elaborate on how the cited sources were incorrect? You can't just deleted vast swaths of an article that has citations because you feel it has a bias without calling for a consensus. Scu ba (talk) 16:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Speculation/opinion with an incorrect citation?

This is about the last sentence, "Specifically, Pagliarulo attacked negative reviews asking for features common in more modern RPG's that were noticeably absent from Starfield."

The citation for it doesn't say anything about common features, "more modern RPGs," or even reviews. Since it's seems like speculation/opinion, we should cite someone with this interpretation of Pagliarulo's comments, so we can say "Some understood his comments to be attacking ..." or something like that. If I missed something and he did specifically attack reviews asking for common features, that should be cited.

So not 100% if this is more than speculation/opinion, but the citation definitely seems wrong. ZippeyKeys12 (talk) 20:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)