Talk:Emil Bodnăraș

On quoting newspaper articles

Sorry, I realized after the fact that the Vartan Arachelian reference was already in there, but by the time I tried to remove it, it was already gone! My mistake, but for the future, just to avoid confusions, can we settle on a way to quote newspaper articles? I usually do it exactly as for articles in books, namely, author/title/source/date -- part of the reason being that the author may well have a wikipage, in which case I link it, but also because I do not view reporters writing newspaper aricles as being inferior somehow to scholars writing in books (though there are quite a bit of exceptions to this rule!) In case at hand, I just looked at the author list, and somehow I missed Arachelian at first glance, since he was mooshed together with the title of the article... Turgidson 15:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I've used the reference style Dahn is using as I found it good enough but also to promote a common methodology in the articles edited by the same group of editors (Romanians, in this case). Of course, there's room for improvement. Though I do not value too much newspapers (they are not usually peer-reviewed, there's no requirement of expertise from someone to write there unlike in scholarly journals, therefore I consider them secondary sources of inferior quality; though indeed sometimes the author might be a scholar/expert), it is good to keep the author names separate as sometimes, as you said it, they might get wikilinked. Daizus 15:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

The best way to achieve a uniform quotation style is through the use of templates, I think. I've done that (not consistently, though -- sigh...), when working on math-related articles. How about using a uniform template for books/scholarly articles/newspaper articles/etc in Romanian-related articles? I'm willing to participate in a discussion on this, if anyone else is interested. I know all sorts of templates for quotations are available, it's just a matter of choosing the "right" one, perhaps with some tweaks, and then sticking to it. Turgidson 15:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

In some articles I've contributed (e.g. Getae) I've used WP:CITET. I'd like very much to use them thoroughly if other editors agree. I do not see at this time any reason why would we need a template specific for Romanian-related articles. It can be a question of aesthetics, though, maybe some people are used with slighly different looking footnotes and references. Daizus 16:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, that sounds good. That page is a bit too long and detailed (kind of scary-looking!) for the casual editor, though -- it may be good to have a summary with only, say, 3 basic examples, tailored to the subject at hand (Romanian history, in this case), and referring to the full discussion there for those who need further info. I'll practice a bit with this format, see how it goes, and perhaps someone can give a short summary later on on the notice board? Turgidson 16:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

By the way, to go back to what I was saying: even on WP:CITET there are 4 different styles of how to possibly quote a newspaper article. They are kind of similar, but have slight variations, most notably, on where to put the date. I personally prefer at the end, and that's also what Dahn and others have been doing, quite consistently. The other issue is how to write names -- my biggest turnoff with these templates is that they use something like Andersen, David, whereas I normally use David Andersen. But I'd go with consensus if need be. At any rate, this is what I meant by that there should be a little bit of a discussion on how to implement these templates -- date placement and name order are two of the pesky little issues that need to be resolved first. :) Turgidson 16:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Name: Bodnariuk. Emil Bodnariuk

how about mentioning the fact that the true name of this Soviet agent, son of an Ukrainian father and German mother, was Bodnariuk?Icar 09:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Picture

Here's a new article about him. Can we import the picture from there? It's a picture of a historical personality that died years ago, the picture is most likely public domain or cover by fair use, is anyone here versed in picture licenses? -- AdrianTM 05:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

File:Emil Bodnaras.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Emil Bodnaras.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emil Bodnăraș. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070218131409/http://www.beius.ro:80/raport%20final_%20cadcr.pdf to http://www.beius.ro/raport%20final_%20cadcr.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Emil Bodnăraș. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.beius.ro/raport%20final_%20cadcr.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.adevarul.ro/actualitate/adevaratul_ceausescu/Sforarul-_Bodnaras_si_lectia_crimei_politice_0_539946343.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011104913/http://ziua.net/display.php?id=183279&data=2005-08-23 to http://ziua.net/display.php?id=183279&data=2005-08-23

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)