Talk:Embolotherium

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

To whoever added the section on Embolotherium brains...Embolotherium's brain size has never been measured. I've seen almost every known specimen of Embolotherium and none of them have an exposed brain case. Measuring Embolotherium's cranial capacity would involve CT scanning one of the few known skulls. However other brontothere brains tend to be small, so Embolotherium probably had a small brain, although I'm not sure if we can make a judgement about intellegence from this. The BBC animated interpretation of Embolotherium interacting with its stillborn calf, which I deleted, is speculation, but at any rate, does not suggest stupidity. Rhinos, and even primates will behave similarly with stillborn infants.

Can we remove the "Brain" section? It sounds too much like the out-dated "they went extinct because they were peabrained ogres" kind of talk people used to say about the inferiority of prehistoric animals.--Mr Fink 15:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

First if there is a reference to a scientific paper on the brain anatomy of this species then it should be included. Second, to say a species died because it is stupid is unscientific and unencyclopedic, than why do other species with smaller brains than Homo sapiens still exist. So a removal is wise and safe. Enlil Ninlil 05:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic