This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Peer Review from Chris Jahn
1. The first thing I noticed with your article was that it very much felt like a Wikipedia article. From the tone to the format, it felt like it was grabbed off the site and that is great. Additionally, you explain the Facebook Files very well. You did your research and most importantly outlined it very well to people reading this. I was aware of these files but your article gave great context and additional information.
2. I don’t have many changes to suggest, but one that I would consider is adding more context for the files’ effect on Facebook. You address that this is their second biggest scandal, so I think adding more background to Facebook’s other controversies and scandals would be helpful. Maybe that makes the article too biased but its something to consider.
3. I think the most important change for you to add would be specific information if available. You reference a lot of material within the files and if you could use quotes or images, etc. of what the files actually say that would be helpful and interesting. If not available disregard this.
4. I will definitely be looking at your article to help me with formatting and tone, you did a great job at that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisjahn21 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
