Talk:Elizabeth (film)/Archive 1

Historical Inaccuracies?

Perhaps some discussion of how historically accurate this film is, particularly with The Golden Age coming out. - Matthew238 05:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, William Cecil is portrayed as a fussy, interfering old man - but Elizabeth regarded him as her rock. He was the one who came up with the phrase, "What! All this for a song?" when he protested against the award of £100 to Edmund Spenser for his presentation of the Faerie Queene at court - ever since, underpaid arty twerps have chosen to ridicule him. And did the film show Mary Queen of Scots being assassinated? I thought the film was accurate in showing that she was stitched up by Francis Walsingham and put to death by law (although the two queens never met). I expect the sequel to show the myth of how Elizabeth prevailed over the forces of Spanish evil, rather than the fact that she ended up a deeply conflicted person who was often disregarded by the people who really disposed of power in protestant England. And will there be anything about Ireland? Howl, howl!--Shtove 22:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether you watched the film poorly, or if you are mistaken about Elizabethan history, but Mary Queen of Scots never appears in the film. I believe that she was not, in fact, in the British Isles during the years depicted. Uucp 23:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I too was confused about the presence of Mary Queen of Scots who, if i'm not mistaken, was assassinated by Walsingham. In the film, she had the trademark brown wig covering up her grey hair, whilst more obviously... she was french. Can anyone shed some light on this? Particularly as Samantha Morton is playing Mary in the sequel 'The Golden Age'. Did Mary rise from the dead..? Bobbyfletch85 16:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It is not Mary Stewart we see assasinated in the film but Mary of Guise, her mother! Even so, the assasination by Walshingham is again inaccurate.

• Have you ever thought of another possible frame connection in fiction? The first relation between film and history is the so called historicity._and there is another connection in lining the literary one. And this film Elizabeth acts on parallel

literary sources. The german dramatic writer of Mary Stuart,F.Schiller flows in the script and therefore the real historic line vanishes.[ Stefan Zweig is a later one ] I myself recognized that and I think it#s right to do this because it's trading written and told about the real reign. The time axes is somehow splittered, but in reasonable tension fields. Who follows whom? and changes the position! The figure Cate Blanchett played is questioning her duty and so she tells something about female souveranity in a monarchy. The director choses democratic frames. So we see something out of today, not modestly censored about a long dead queen.--88.77.196.208 (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

"In the film, Dudley's wife dies when she wears one of Elizabeth's dresses poisoned"

in the film it's not the Dudley's wife who wears the poisoned dress. --151.28.245.227 (talk) 04:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Elizabeth A.jpg

Image:Elizabeth A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Clive Owen

Clive Owen is listed as starring in this film, but he was only in Elizabeth: The Golden Age. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.184.214.97 (talk) 19:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Sexuality Question

I saw that it was rated "R" for violence and sexuality. Elizabeth (Blanchett) didn't have sex in the movie did she? Or else it would be historically inaccurate. (i havent seen the movie myself but i'm thinking of it) thanks. 71.49.92.224 (talk) 23:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The Duke of Norfolk is seen having sex.--Johnbull (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

This page needs fixing badly

Is it me or is the plot section not really a plot synopsis, but rather part-plot/part-someone's-hack-job-at-analysing-the-film? The plot section should entail the plot of the film and not delve into critique - definitely does not suit encyclopedic format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.153.74 (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Dramatic License

Many of the statements regarding the film’s dramatic license are poorly researched. The author of this page doesn’t acknowledge the conflicting historical evidence regarding certain facts and relationships. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iris Kirby (talk • contribs) 12:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Even were this section completely accurate, and copiously historically referenced -- which it is not -- it would all be a massive exercise in inappropriate synthesis. What it would need would be reliable sources making such observations in the context of this film. 84.203.40.54 (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Elizabeth (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001030212/http://www.ropeofsilicon.com:80/award_show/oscars/1999 to http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/award_show/oscars/1999
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bfca.org/ccawards/1998.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426202601/http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/award_show/golden_globe_awards/1999/ to http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/award_show/golden_globe_awards/1999
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512021740/http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/pages/awards/98awards to http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/pages/awards/98awards

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/award_show/oscars/1999
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017115907/http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=58 to http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=58

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927184207/http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=1998 to http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=1998

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Lord Harewood

• Where is Lord Harewood? I.G.I.cool (talk) 23:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)