| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This article is only stuffed with an amount of personal data.... what about her thought? Henry Cassini 09:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
"Lloyd's book represents a significant publication in ongoing debates" - "the reactions to Lloyd's book belie not only the scholarly significance, but also the depth of research and strength of argument of her book". What is the basis for these claims? They are POV and should be removed. --Katach (talk) 08:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Lawsuit edit
This isn't the same Elizabeth Lloyd in New Jersey that is suing that 11-year old kid for $500k is it? 206.255.67.75 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC)