Talk:Elisabeth (musical)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:SwedishEli2.JPG edit
Image:SwedishEli2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SwissElisa2.JPG edit
Image:SwissElisa2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Elisabeth DVD Cover.JPG edit
Image:Elisabeth DVD Cover.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Elisabeth Logo.JPG edit
Image:Elisabeth Logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Assessment edit
The article is full of crufty lists. It needs a narrative description that follows the WP:MUSICALS article structure guidelines, and all of the non-notable list information should be deleted. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Identity of Prince Schwarzenberg? edit
I think I have found the Wikipedia article for a historical figure corresponding to Schwarzenberg: Prince Felix of Schwarzenberg
He seems to match the portrayal in the musical due to his take on foreign policy and the Crimean War. However, there's one small problem - the number 'Jedem gibt er das Seine' takes place in 1853 (Lucheni: "Wir schreiben das Jahr 1853."), and this Schwarzenberg died in 1852. I don't know my Austrian history very well (and my German is not that great), so is anybody able to verify that this is the right person?
Also, if this isn't important for the article, please tell me - I'm pretty new to Wikipedia and may need a bit of guidance here and there. Thank you!
Gloombox (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Elisabeth (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051120083404/http://www.theatre-musical.com/elisabeth.html to http://theatre-musical.com/elisabeth.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090519202035/http://www.elisabeth-das-musical.com/01home_de.php to http://www.elisabeth-das-musical.com/01home_de.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070330191322/http://www.umegei.com/erz/index.html to http://www.umegei.com/erz/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070428022513/http://www.elisabeth-fc-stuttgart.de/ to http://www.elisabeth-fc-stuttgart.de/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928070435/http://www.thunerseespiele.ch/de/page/?mc=tools&sc=galerie&page=video%2F to http://www.thunerseespiele.ch/de/page/?mc=tools&sc=galerie&page=video%2F
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Why are there 3 sections explaining the plot? edit
The current version of this article has a summary, synopsis, then a full description of each plot point and song, plus three tenuously-connected poems/phrases that seem to have no relation to the rest of the article. There's also a section about the staging of the musical in Japan that is full of fancruft. Looking through the edit history, it seems clear that these are edits from someone highly invested in the musical, but who may not have a handle on concise speech.
I propose that the sections "Act one", "Act two" (and its subsections), and "As for the presentations in Japan" be removed from this article. If the Takarazuka productions are integral to knowing about the musical and people don't want to remove that section, then I propose drastic copyediting of the section to explain why it's so important.—A garbage person (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Since I've had no response on this for two months, I'll assume that people are okay with the proposed removal and I will go ahead and remove them. —A garbage person (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)