This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
What's the issue here? The information in this revert appears to be referenced. If it's false, then the newspaper in question is wrong. If it's outdated (not the same as false), then that's a different matter. Mackensen(talk) 21:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
So far as I can tell, it's simple vandalism which User:Marek69 and I have been reverting. @RedPanda25: Could you please explain why you labeled this as an edit war subject to 3RR, rather than simple vandalism which is not? @2601:193:C400:6CF4:C62C:3FF:FE2E:D18E: Could you please explain why the information you have been deleting - which is supported by multiple citations - is false, and provide evidence to support that? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
