Talk:Electrolux Trilobite

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Neutrality edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article seems like it was written by people at Electrolux, or at the very least, people who are biased toward their product. It seems to me that a more objective technical discussion is more appropriate here, as Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, not an advertising space.

One quick google after reading the article and I found a site selling the trilobyte and some other electric vacuums. There's a spec on there, as well as details of some other robovacs. 88.212.174.4 08:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article seems to objectively characterize the strengths, faults, and similarities to Roombas as well as fairly discussing how the device works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mc.7winkie (talk • contribs) 03:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

too much comparison edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article spend too much on comparing with Roomba instead of just describing the features of the Trilobite. The article on the Roomba is better is this regard. Pukkie (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic