Talk:Electriquette/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 15 hours ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 00:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Marshelec (talk · contribs) 20:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will review this GA nomination over the next few days.Marshelec (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Summary

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·