Talk:Electric organ (fish)/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Chiswick Chap in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jj1691 (talk · contribs) 23:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • I noted your edit. On the Rajiformes, it's only the skates (Rajidae) which are electric, and they're marine, so I've updated the table entry. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

{{subst:#if:Nice piece of work, meets all criteria. With slight improvements a great FA|


Nice piece of work, meets all criteria. With slight improvements a great FA|}}

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{1com}}}|}}
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section):   b (inline citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{2com}}}|}}
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{3com}}}|}}
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{6com}}}|}}
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    {{subst:#if:|{{{7com}}}|}}