Talk:Electric multiple unit (Queensland Rail)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Electric multiple unit (Queensland Rail). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.home.railscene.com/zanatta/trinpk85/85trpk.htm
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.home.railscene.com/zanatta/mayne96/mayne96.htm
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.home.railscene.com/zanatta/petrie01/petrie-01.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Electric multiple unit (Queensland Rail). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511022149/http://www.queenslandrail.com.au:80/AboutUs/MediaCentre/Fleet/Pages/emu.aspx to http://www.queenslandrail.com.au/AboutUs/MediaCentre/Fleet/Pages/emu.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110401180723/http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability%5Frights/action_plans/Register/QR%20DDA%20Action%20Plan%202007-2012%20(Plain%20Text).txt to http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/action_plans/Register/QR%20DDA%20Action%20Plan%202007-2012%20%28Plain%20Text%29.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 21 January 2020 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Electric multiple unit (Queensland Rail) → Electric Multiple Unit (Queensland Rail) – Currently the Queensland Rail rolling stock articles are named in a combination of upper and lower case format. Official name per operator Queensland Rail is to capitalise all words (Electric Multiple Unit) vs (Electric multiple unit) [1] while many secondary sources use the EMU acronym.
The Manual of style section on trademarks states editors should choose among styles already in common use (not invent new ones) and, among those, use the style that most closely resembles standard English text formatting and capitalization rules.
Can't find any examples of Electric multiple unit being used other than on Wikipedia, so suggest article should be renamed Electric Multiple Unit. Primetime44 (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:CAPS and per WP:CONSISTENT with other similar articles, especially the obvious Electric multiple unit. This is a class of things, not a thing, so this is a common-noun phrase not a proper name. Cf. all the zillion prior RMs of ocean vessel classes, music genres, roadway types, non-trademarked sports and games and dances (and classes thereof), etc., etc., etc. The fact than an "official" source prefers to capitalize is meaningless (this is almost always the case is in the bureaucratese of government agencies/ministries, and in the marketing-style materials of manufacturers; both styles rampantly overcapitalize for emphasis, which is against the first rule of MOS:CAPS. It simply isn't an encyclopedic writing style. And there isn't anything magically special about Queensland. PS: No, do not use "mixed" case; this should appear as "electric multiple unit" in mid-sentence, not "Electric multiple unit". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 08:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose—why on Earth?? What doubt is there when "Queensland Rail" is embedded in the title? To cap would go against our style guides ... and reasonable practice. Tony (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:CAPS and WP:CONSISTENT per the reasoning of SmCandlish. Coastie43 (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per suburban multiple unit, this proposal is at odds with MOS:CAPS. Shem (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not sure of how to cite this information edit
As per the latest edit, I added info from an official ASEA source that this guy photographed, which I'm unsure of how to cite. Please help me by changing it up a bit. Edgar Searle (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)