Talk:Electoral results for the Division of Corinella (1901–1906)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Victoria / Politics List‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Electoral results for the Division of Corinella (1901–1906) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Are references available for these quantitative election results? Otherwise, I think they should be deleted. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic