Talk:Electoral history of Ronald Reagan

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic Article or list?

Article or list? edit

I saw this pop up over at WP:GAN, and my first thought upon looking at the article was that it was really a list rather than an article; should this be tried at WP:FLC instead? Wizardman 11:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wizardman, Personally, I would say that this is an article rather than a list, as it contains prose, although I will admit that I am not too familiar with MOS:LIST. I think the better question is whether, in general, articles about the electoral history of a person are considered articles or lists. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Wizardman and 1990'sguy: In my opinion, articles about electoral history should be considered as articles, and not lists. But the issue is that most of the articles just list the votes and percentage There should be prose for every election or campaign. For instance, I recently cam across a brilliant article "Political career of John C. Breckinridge", which is somewhat like electoral history. Also, I recently expanded Electoral history of Bill Clinton; which is based on the ides that each campaign/election should have a prose with the election data. Since this article is a GA, I don't think there should be any confusion on the same. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Electoral history of Ronald Reagan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 07:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Lead edit

  • This lead is incredibly short for an article of this length, much less for a GA nomination. Though the article looks pretty well–kept and factual, you could definitely talk about everything he ran for and the outcomes for the more important elections (a.k.a Presidential elections.)
  • "(1981–1989)" --> "(1981–89)"
  • "(1967–1975)" --> "(1967–75)"

California gubernatorial election, 1966 edit

  • "Ronald Reagan accomplished in 1966 what US Senator William F. Knowland in 1958 and former Vice-President Richard M. Nixon in 1962 had tried: he was elected, defeating two-term governor Edmund G. "Pat" Brown, and was sworn in on January 2, 1967." --> No source

California gubernatorial election, 1970 edit

  • "Reagan was re-elected in 1970, defeating "Big Daddy" Jesse Unruh." --> No source
  • "He chose not to seek a third term in the following election cycle." --> No source

1980 Presidential election edit

  • "Reagan ran against Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter and independent candidate John B. Anderson." --> No source
  • "Aided by the Iran hostage crisis and a worsening economy at home marked by high unemployment and inflation, Reagan won the election in a landslide, receiving the highest number of electoral votes ever won by a non-incumbent presidential candidate." --> No source
    • I'm sure that the latter part of the sentence is true, but I could not find a reliable source for it, so I had to remove it. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • "The 1980 presidential election marked the beginning of the Reagan Era, and signified a conservative realignment in national politics." --> No source

1984 Presidential election edit

  • "No presidential candidate since 1984 then has managed to equal or surpass Reagan's electoral result, nor has any post-1984 Republican candidate managed to match Reagan's electoral performance in the Northeastern United States and in the West Coast states." --> No source
    • I'm sure this is true, but I could not find a reliable source repeating this, so I removed this. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

See also edit

  • "Democratic Party, Reagan was a member of this party early in his life, and was mainly opposed by this party during his political career." --> "Democratic Party, Reagan was a member of this party early in his life, but was mainly opposed by this party during his political career."

Other notes edit

  • I would prefer you remove the red links to any candidates who do not have respective articles, but once again, this is not against any Wikipedia policy (at least that I know of.)

End of GA Review: edit

My shortest GA review for a reason. Thanks for the review. @PING me when you have completed it; thanks. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 20:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC).Reply

@Carbrera: Thank you for for your comments and for your help. I fixed everything that you told me to fix. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electoral history of Ronald Reagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Success! --1990'sguy (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electoral history of Ronald Reagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply