This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Why are so many articles in Wikipedia politically biased? 47.220.137.27 (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Because the scholasticism in universities have declined. Where diversity and inclusion are producing opinion based science. Conjecture is allowed. There is little to no management or executive support to raise academic standards. So we academicians rise to provide academic excellence without confirmation bias Randy J. Hinrichs (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
One answer may be that there is no arrangement of facts that lacks bias. A better answer is that not enough readers are bold in making edits that improve NPOV. john factorial (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
