Talk:Eleanor Hadley

Latest comment: 1 year ago by RoySmith in topic Did you know nomination
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eleanor Hadley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk15:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits). Self-nominated at 16:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC).Reply

Engmaj (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Sure, "candidate" vs. "student" makes sense. I like ALT2 best because the most compelling element of the hook for me is her youth and academic status when recruited and ALT2 (and ALT5) keeps all that info about Hadley right up front and then moves to who recruited her and for what. I can see a good argument for ALT5, too. You give up specifying her academic field in order to specify that she was not solely responsible for implementing antitrust policies. Perhaps that is more accurate but since the readers of the DYK may be encountering Hadley for the first time and won't have the context of knowing she's an economist, I'd lean towards giving them that context in your hook.Reply

@Engmaj: Glad to hear the ALTs work! Since you approve, would you complete the review by replying with a green checkmark confirming that this nomination is approved?
As for which specific ALT is chosen, I'm happy to leave that up to you or whoever puts this in a queue. ALT2 and ALT5 put the hooky information up front, but ALT3 and ALT4 make it into a kind of "punchline" in an impressive sense, like a twist. Both approaches have pros and cons. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 20:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Engmaj (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)   Your call on which hook to use. Glad to have learned about another interesting woman.Reply

Thanks very much for your review! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydrangeans (talkcontribs) 17:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply