Talk:Elbrus 2000

Speedy deletion

There is a large russian article to this microprocessor and a smaller one in german. Just started to write the english article about an existing CPU. So I don't understand why this article meets the requirements for speedy deletion ... :-O --Saiht (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't - except to some Deletionist editor on some power trip. Yet another sad example of why potential editors are fleeing Wikipedia. =//= Johnny Squeaky 03:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

ELBRUS

ExpLicit Basic Resources Utilization Scheduling — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.223.86.238 (talk) 07:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

• That's a backronym. Originally Elbrus was simply a brand of sorts of the Lebedev Institute of Precise Mechanics and Computing Technology, or ITMIVT, one of the leading Soviet IT centers, where most of the Soviet supercomputers were designed. There were at least three distinct and internally unrelated Elbrus generation, first one more or less inspired by Burroughs large systems (it was even nicknamed "el-Burroughs" by its developers) with their tagged memory and high-level machine code, the second, Elbrus-2, was a microprocessor evolution of the Elbrus-1 architecture using a home-developed microcoded RISC chips, and third, Elbrus-3, was the first prototype of Babayan's VLIW design, which he later developed into a standalone CPU. After that, the ITMiVT spun off the MCST as a commercial company to exploit and sell the technologies developed there, and it has since continued the Babayan's CPU architecture, and inherited the institute's brand, splitting it into a SPARC-based R-series, and VLIW Elbrus-2000 series (e2k to short). -Khathi (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elbrus 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055344/http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/elbrus-e2k.html to http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/elbrus-e2k.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Summary feels like an ad

The following excerpt of the article's summary feels like an ad.

Thanks to its unique architecture the Elbrus 2000 can execute 20 instructions per clock, so even with its modest clock speed it can compete with much faster clocked superscalar microprocessors when running in native VLIW mode.[1][2]

For security reasons the Elbrus 2000 architecture implements dynamic data type-checking during execution. In order to prevent unauthorized access, each pointer has additional type information that is verified when the associated data is accessed.[3] 62.16.197.89 (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)