Talk:Elaine Murphy, Baroness Murphy

Untitled

When was she born?Max Mux (talk) 11:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Cello scrotum

• oppose merge - article seems adequate to stand alone. PamD (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

• oppose merge - it should not. There is too much merging, making the Wikipedia much less useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.29.126 (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

• oppose merge. There are plenty more sources about this hoax than about the baroness herself. Xasodfuih (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

• support merge - it's a very brief article and there is little scope for expansion. I don't see how merging it would make Wikipedia "less useful". MultipleTom (talk) 20:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

• oppose merge. The Cello Scrotum article is notable, verified, has appropriate citations and stands alone. Adding the content to Elaine Murphy's entry would drown out the rest of her bibliographical information and distract from her real notability as a member of the House of Lords. 193.201.196.10 (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

• oppose merge per PamD. Kittybrewster ☎ 09:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• Clear consensus. I'm removing the merge notices. Fences and windows (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elaine Murphy, Baroness Murphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101213115737/http://city.ac.uk/news/archive/2006/01_january/16012006_3.html to http://www.city.ac.uk/news/archive/2006/01_january/16012006_3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)