This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The tone of this stub makes little sense, and appears to have been written by someone with poor English skills. It provides little context as to why it is prestigious. The stub is entirely lacking any sources. Bearian (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have completed the stub, and tried to solve some of the problems. It is difficult to quote sources though. The fact is that El Croquis is a reference for architects all over the world; the Chinese print fakes of the new issues within days; students treasure their illegally downloaded pdf versions. Ask any internationally minded architect - that is all I can say.--Arch-Ark (talk) 05:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
The list of publications is now a full chart (fixing all the links took me quite a while!). I think we can now remove the stub notice. --Megustalastrufas (talk) 09:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply