Just a suggestion, are the subheadings in this section intended to be expanded into fuller subsections so they can be linked? If not it may be better to list them like in this article already or perhaps here? Maschen (talk) 11:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
- I hadn't really given it much (any) thought, I just wanted to clearly separate and label the statements; no plans to link, although the names "supplement 1" and "supplement 2" are the same for other reciprocity laws, eg. quadratic reciprocity. - Virginia-American (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
- By all means I'll leave the subsections to fill up if so, just asking. Again, thanks for your hard work into this article. Maschen (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
